Some Montgomery Ballots Mishandled

More than one million people went to the polls yesterday in Alabama.
Â
Some of those voters in Montgomery got the wrong ballot.
Â
The Alabama Republican Party claims two polling stations in Montgomery mishandled ballots.
Â
And while it had the party up in arms last night, Probate Judge Steven Reed says there was a problem, but it wasn’t that dramatic.
Â
Each ballot was cast and counted, adding up to 41 percent of registered voters in the state.
A number Secretary of State Jim Bennett says was a bit lower than even he anticipated.Â
Â
“We had predicted as high as 48, but there was just too little interest in the races at the top,” said Bennett.
Â
Soon after the polls closed, the Alabama Republican Party sent out a statement claiming two of Montgomery’s largest polling locations had severely mishandled ballots. It says voters received the wrong ballot.Â
Â
Alabama GOP chairman Bill Armistead said, “These Democrat and Republican candidates alike have worked for many months to get to today, only to see their hard work result in a travesty. And, voters were denied the right to vote for the candidate of their choice.”
Â
Montgomery Probate Judge Steven Reed said he took the claims very seriously, but only found problems at one precinct, the Newtown Church of Christ.
Â
“We did find evidence at one precinct where 128 people got the wrong ballot. That particular precinct there was a ballot split between two ballots and they were just given the same ballot,” said Judge Reed.
Â
Reed says the problem was likely caused by the new district lines for the state house and the problem was fixed before 3 o’clock on election day. Even though there was an issue, Reed wants Armistead to be careful before jumping to conclusions.
Â
“I think the party leadership has to be careful not to lose credibility coming off unstable and uninformed.I think before you go and put out a press release you should check the facts first. Because when you highlight a matter you aren’t sure about, it really shines on the particular party chairman, so I was somewhat disappointed by that,” said Reed.Â
Â
Those ballots would have affected the state house races for Alvin Holmes and John Knight.
Â
Reed says both men won by a large margin and the votes would not have changed the outcome of the race.Â
Â
Any of the candidates can challenge the results, but Judge Reed said he would be surprised if that happened.Â
Â



